Ankle Monitor Tampering: What Are The Immediate Consequences?

If you cut off an ankle monitor, you will likely set off an alarm. A radio transmitter embedded in the bracelet is programmed to send a distress signal as soon as it's tampered with. While it's easy to cut off an ankle monitor, it's very difficult to put it back on without leaving signs of tampering. If you cut off your ankle monitor and are caught, you will likely face new charges and be considered to have violated the terms of your monitoring program.

An alarm is set off, sending a distress signal to authorities

Ankle monitors are equipped with a radio transmitter that is programmed to send a distress signal to the authorities as soon as it is tampered with. This is achieved through a wire that runs the length of the band, which, when cut, breaks a circuit and triggers an alert. Some ankle monitors also use internal light sensors to detect any prying of the transmitter's housing.

The alert notifies the relevant authorities, such as the police, that the person wearing the ankle monitor may be attempting to evade supervision or monitoring. This could be due to a violation of the terms of their bail, parole, or probation conditions. As such, the authorities may initiate a search or pursuit to locate the individual and bring them back into custody.

The activation of the distress signal indicates a potential breach of the conditions set for the individual's release or supervision. This could result in legal consequences, such as additional charges or a revocation of bail or parole. The authorities may also increase supervision or impose stricter conditions to prevent further attempts at evading monitoring.

In addition to setting off an alarm, cutting off an ankle monitor can have significant legal repercussions. The act of tampering with or removing the monitoring device is often considered a violation of the conditions set by the court or correctional facility. This violation can lead to additional criminal charges, such as obstruction of justice or contempt of court.

The distress signal is designed to prompt a timely response from the authorities to address the situation. Depending on the jurisdiction and the nature of the case, the response may vary. In some cases, the authorities may deploy law enforcement officers to locate and apprehend the individual. In other cases, they may issue a warrant for their arrest, leading to a wider search involving multiple agencies.

The wearer may go into hiding, but the bracelet can't be put back on

While it is possible to cut off an ankle monitor, it is not a good idea. If someone cuts off their ankle monitor, it will likely set off an alarm. A radio transmitter embedded in the bracelet is programmed to send a distress signal as soon as it is tampered with. Even if the wearer goes into hiding, the bracelet cannot be put back on without signs of tampering being visible. Parole officers or other supervisors regularly examine the bracelets, and if they see any signs of tampering, such as cut marks or twisted plastic, the offender is considered to have violated the terms of their monitoring program.

The bracelets are designed to be easy to remove in an emergency. For example, if the wearer became caught in machinery or required emergency medical care, the bracelet could be quickly and easily removed. However, this also means that it is simple for a wearer to cut off the bracelet with a pair of scissors or even rip it off with enough force.

If someone cuts off their ankle monitor, they are violating the terms of their monitoring program and may face legal consequences. In the case of Clifton Grier, who was originally charged with robbery and theft, cutting off his ankle monitor resulted in new charges, including resisting an officer. It is important to note that going into hiding and attempting to avoid detection will not help the situation, as the bracelet cannot be put back on without signs of tampering being visible.

The wearer is in violation of the monitoring program

If a person cuts off their ankle monitor, they are in violation of the monitoring program. Ankle monitors are usually worn by people who are out on bail or parole and are a condition of their release. By cutting off the monitor, the wearer is breaking the terms of their release and can face legal consequences.

When an ankle monitor is tampered with or cut off, it typically sets off an alarm, alerting authorities that something is wrong. The monitor contains a radio transmitter that sends a distress signal when it is tampered with. This means that the authorities will be quickly notified and will be able to take action.

Parole officers or supervisors regularly examine the ankle monitors for any signs of tampering, such as cut marks or twisted plastic. If they find any evidence of tampering, it is considered a violation of the monitoring program. The wearer may face additional charges or have their bail or parole revoked, leading to re-arrest and possible incarceration.

In addition to cutting off the ankle monitor, some people also let the batteries of the device die. This is also considered a violation of the monitoring program, as the wearer is no longer being monitored effectively. The consequences of a dead battery can be just as severe as those for cutting off the monitor, and the wearer may face similar legal repercussions.

Paramedics may need to remove it to provide medical care

Ankle monitors are signal devices that send the wearer's information to a remote system, typically attached to the ankle. They are used for a variety of reasons, including alcohol monitoring, restraining orders, pre-trial supervision, probation, parole, house arrest, and immigration detention. These devices can have a significant impact on the wearer's mental health, causing stress and distraction.

In certain situations, such as medical emergencies, paramedics may need to remove an ankle monitor to provide effective medical care. This is because the ankle monitor could pose a health risk to the wearer if it cannot be removed. For example, the device could get caught in heavy machinery or medical equipment. Most ankle monitors on the market can be easily cut or even ripped off with enough force. The SCRAM bracelet, for instance, has a labelled line indicating where to cut in an emergency.

It is important to note that removing an ankle monitor without permission is considered a violation of the court order. However, in the case of medical examinations such as MRI, CT-scan, and X-ray, the wearer can request permission from their supervision officer to temporarily remove the device. This process may require legal assistance and medical documentation to support the request.

If an individual attempts to remove an ankle monitor without authorization, it will likely trigger an alarm. A radio transmitter embedded in the bracelet sends a distress signal as soon as it is tampered with. Additionally, cutting the wire that runs through the band breaks a circuit, sending an alert to the authorities. Therefore, while ankle monitors can be physically removed in an emergency, it is crucial to follow the proper procedures to avoid legal consequences.

Some let the battery die instead of cutting it off

While cutting off an ankle monitor is a surefire way to trigger an alarm and alert the authorities, some people opt for a more subtle approach by letting the battery die instead. This method, though less drastic, can still have the same consequences.

The battery-draining tactic is a way to buy time without raising an immediate red flag. Ankle monitors are designed to send a distress signal when tampered with, and cutting the device is a clear sign of tampering. However, letting the battery run out of charge doesn't trigger the same urgent response.

Despite this, the authorities are quick to react to a dead battery. When an ankle monitor loses power, law enforcement agencies are notified, and they spring into action. In the case of Clifton Grier, the police rearrested him more than a week after his electronic monitor died. Grier, initially charged with robbery and theft, faced additional charges, including resisting an officer.

A similar incident occurred with a teenager who was accused of letting his ankle monitor battery die. Just days later, he was charged with raping and robbing a woman. These cases highlight the consequences of letting an ankle monitor's battery die, which can be just as severe as cutting it off.

The issue of defendants letting their ankle monitor batteries die has sparked criticism of the electronic monitoring program. Char-Meck Court Watch spokesperson Marcus Philemon expressed concern, stating that taxpayers are bearing the cost of a flawed system. He also highlighted the growing number of people charged with violent crimes who are released on electronic monitoring.

To address this issue, a team of CMPD officers is dedicated to monitoring defendants 24/7. They make efforts to contact individuals with low batteries, even visiting them in person if needed. However, not all defendants take the matter seriously, and dead batteries contribute to the challenges faced by law enforcement in keeping track of those on the program.

Frequently asked questions