Capturing Nibiru: Camera Settings For The Elusive Planet

The Nibiru cataclysm is a supposed disastrous encounter between Earth and a large planetary object, either a collision or a near miss. The idea was first put forward in 1995 by Nancy Lieder, who claimed she could receive messages from aliens. She predicted that in May 2003, Earth would undergo a physical pole shift that would destroy most of humanity. The date was later postponed and the idea spread beyond her website, embraced by numerous internet doomsday groups. Since 2012, the Nibiru cataclysm has frequently reappeared in the popular media, usually linked to newsmaking astronomical objects. Despite the lack of scientific evidence, many continue to claim sightings of Nibiru, often from fuzzy photographs or NASA images. Most photographs purporting to show Nibiru are lens flares or other camera defects. It is not possible to see Nibiru through a camera.

Don't stare at the sun to try and see Nibiru

Staring at the sun to try and see Nibiru is not a good idea. The radiation that damages your eyes is mainly UV light, and this is not visible. So even if the sun looks dim, perhaps because it is behind clouds, you don't know if it is safe without a UV light detector.

Infrared light can also harm your eyes, especially if viewed through binoculars or a telescope. And there are no pain receptors in your retina, so you won't feel the damage being done. The damage often shows up only some time later, and you may think everything is fine but then gradually lose your vision.

Even if you don't look directly at the sun, the brightness of the sky during the day can cause discomfort and even eye damage. Sunburn starts to happen as soon as someone looks at the sun, and the eyes can feel gritty and excessive tearing can occur. If someone continues to stare at the sun, they can develop solar retinopathy, which can be permanent.

Solar retinopathy occurs when overstimulated light-sensing retina cells start to release signalling chemicals. This flood of chemicals can cause tissue damage. While recovery does occur for some people, it is possible to experience permanent visual acuity deficits.

Permanent retinal damage can occur when someone looks at the sun for 100 seconds or less. This is under two minutes.

The best way to protect your eyes is to avoid looking directly at the sun, and to wear sunglasses that filter out both UVA and UVB light when you are outdoors.

Most photos of Nibiru are lens flares

Most of the photographs purporting to show Nibiru are lens flares, false images of the Sun caused by reflections within the lens.

Lens flares are artefacts that can occur when a camera's lens is exposed to bright light, such as the Sun. They can be caused by light reflecting off the surfaces of the lens or from light bouncing around inside the lens. Lens flares can be identified by their characteristic appearance: they often look like a starburst or a set of concentric circles around the Sun. They can also be distinguished from celestial objects by their movement—if you move the camera, the lens flare will move with it.

Lens flares can be avoided by using a lens hood or by blocking the Sun with your hand or another object.

Nibiru is a belief that doesn't make sense

Firstly, the idea that a planet-sized object will collide with or closely pass by Earth is not supported by any scientific evidence. Astronomers have pointed out that such an object so close to Earth would be easily visible to the naked eye and would cause noticeable effects in the orbits of the outer planets. Most photographs purporting to show Nibiru are, in fact, lens flares, false images of the Sun caused by reflections within the lens. Claims that Nibiru has been concealed behind the Sun are also untenable. An orbit like that of Nibiru (within the planetary region of the Solar System) is inconsistent with celestial mechanics.

Secondly, the belief that Nibiru is only visible from the South Pole is easily disproven. Just as the pole star is visible from most of the entire northern hemisphere, the southern cross is visible from most of the southern hemisphere. Anything visible in the night sky above the South Pole would also be visible in Australia, New Zealand, Southern Africa, and South America.

Thirdly, the idea that ancient astronomers predicted Nibiru is highly unlikely. Ancient mathematicians and astronomers did not have the advanced knowledge and tools we have today. For example, the Sumerians, one of the most advanced ancient civilisations when it came to mathematics, lacked an understanding of ratios and did not have negative numbers, zero, or logarithms. They also believed that meteorites came from volcanoes or strong winds and that comets were atmospheric phenomena, similar to clouds.

Finally, the Nibiru cataclysm theory was first proposed by Nancy Lieder, a Wisconsin woman who claims to have been contacted by extraterrestrials who implanted a communications device in her brain. Lieder's predictions have repeatedly failed to come true, and she has since claimed that the non-arrival of Nibiru was a "white lie" to "fool the establishment". She has refused to disclose a new date for the cataclysm, stating that doing so would give those in power enough time to implement martial law.

In conclusion, the Nibiru cataclysm theory lacks scientific evidence, contradicts basic astronomical knowledge, and is based on the unsubstantiated claims of a single individual.

Nibiru is not supported by scientific evidence

The idea of Nibiru is not supported by scientific evidence and has been rejected by astronomers and planetary scientists as pseudoscience and an Internet hoax. Here are several reasons why:

Firstly, a planet-sized object on a collision course with Earth or passing dangerously close to it in the near future would have already caused noticeable effects on the orbits of the outer planets in our solar system. These effects would be easily observable today.

Secondly, the orbit of Nibiru, as described by its proponents, is inconsistent with celestial mechanics. According to NASA space scientist David Morrison, if such an object had flown by Earth in Sumerian times as claimed, Earth would no longer be in its current near-circular orbit and would likely have lost its moon.

Thirdly, if Nibiru were a brown dwarf, the effects on our solar system would be even more severe, as brown dwarfs are far more massive than planets. A brown dwarf in our solar system would have already had catastrophic effects on the orbits of the planets, which are not observed.

Fourthly, if Nibiru were a real planet on such an orbit, it would only have remained in our solar system for about a million years before being expelled by Jupiter.

Fifthly, the claims that Nibiru's approach would cause Earth's rotation to stop or its axis to shift violate the laws of physics. This claim was rebutted by Carl Sagan, who noted that the energy required to stop the Earth's rotation would not be enough to melt it, although it would raise the temperature of the oceans to the boiling point of water. Sagan also pointed out the problem of how the Earth's rotation would restart, as there is no mechanism for this in the laws of physics.

Sixthly, if Nibiru were a real planet in our solar system, it would be easily observable by amateur astronomers, who frequently observe Pluto and other distant objects. The fact that no such observations have been made by the hundreds of thousands of amateur astronomers worldwide casts serious doubt on the existence of Nibiru.

In conclusion, the idea of Nibiru lacks scientific support and is rejected by the scientific community as pseudoscience and a hoax. The claims made about Nibiru are inconsistent with our understanding of physics and celestial mechanics, and no evidence has been provided to support its existence.

Nibiru is not a rogue planet

The idea of Nibiru, a rogue planet that will collide with Earth, was first put forward in 1995 by Nancy Lieder, a self-proclaimed psychic who claimed she could communicate with aliens. Lieder stated that Nibiru would collide with Earth in 2003, but when this failed to occur, she and her followers moved the date to 2012, coinciding with the end of the Mayan calendar.

However, Nibiru is not a rogue planet. There is no scientific evidence supporting its existence, and it has been rejected by astronomers and planetary scientists as pseudoscience and an internet hoax. Here are several reasons why Nibiru is not a rogue planet:

• A planet with an orbit of 3,600 years that brings it close to Earth would have significantly disrupted the orbits of the other planets in our solar system. Over time, the gravitational forces of these planets would have changed the hypothetical planet's orbit significantly.
• If Nibiru existed, it would be visible to the naked eye. Calculations show that by April 2012, it would have been brighter than the faintest stars viewed from a city and almost as bright as Mars at its dimmest. This would have made it visible to astronomers everywhere.
• The idea of a planet with an orbit like Nibiru's is inconsistent with celestial mechanics. As NASA space scientist David Morrison explains, if such a planet had passed by Earth in Sumerian times, as proponents claim, Earth would no longer be in its current near-circular orbit and may have lost its moon.
• If Nibiru were a brown dwarf, it would have even more drastic effects on our solar system, as brown dwarfs are far more massive.
• Pluto is frequently observed by backyard telescopes, so any giant planet beyond Pluto would be easily observed by amateur astronomers.
• Lieder's assertions that Nibiru's approach would cause Earth's rotation to stop or its axis to shift violate the laws of physics. As astronomer Carl Sagan noted, the energy required to stop the Earth's rotation would result in a noticeable increase in temperature, boiling the oceans. Additionally, there is no mechanism for the Earth to restart its rotation at the same rate.
• For a planet to travel 1,000 AU in two years, as Nibiru is purported to do, it would need to be moving at 2,400 km/s, which is faster than the galactic escape velocity. At this speed, any object would be shot out of our solar system and into intergalactic space.
• Most photographs purporting to show Nibiru beside the Sun are lens flares, false images caused by reflections within the lens.

In conclusion, Nibiru is not a rogue planet. It is a fictitious idea with no scientific basis, and there is no evidence to support its existence.

Frequently asked questions