Performance Monitoring: A Key Management Function

Management is a complex role that requires a broad skill set and the ability to navigate various challenges. One of the four primary functions of management is controlling, which involves monitoring employee performance, work quality, and the efficiency and reliability of completed projects. This function is highly intertwined with the planning phase, as managers need to anticipate potential issues and make adjustments to ensure progress towards established goals. Performance management is a tool used by managers to monitor and evaluate employees' work, providing ongoing feedback to help individuals perform to the best of their abilities and in alignment with the organisation's overall vision. This creates an environment of accountability and transparency, fostering a clear understanding of expectations and improving overall communication.

Setting performance standards

Performance standards serve as benchmarks that guide employees' behaviours and tasks, providing a clear direction for their efforts. These standards are typically set by managers and communicated to employees, either directly or through performance management tools and systems.

When setting performance standards, managers should consider the specific actions and resources required to achieve the organisational goals. This includes determining the necessary steps, allocating resources effectively, and establishing realistic timelines. For example, a sales manager might set a performance standard of increasing sales revenue by 14% over a year, with monthly sales targets to monitor progress.

It is important to note that performance standards should be tailored to the specific needs and context of the organisation. They should also be flexible, allowing for adjustments as plans are implemented and new challenges or opportunities arise. For instance, if a team is struggling to meet a sales target due to unforeseen circumstances, managers may decide to reallocate resources or adjust the timeline to support the team in achieving the goal.

Additionally, performance standards should be developed with employee input. Encouraging employees to participate in goal-setting fosters a sense of ownership and motivation, increasing the likelihood of successful performance. This collaborative approach also ensures that employees understand how their individual contributions align with the organisation's overall goals, creating a cohesive and engaged workforce.

In summary, setting performance standards is a critical function of management, providing direction, clarity, and motivation for employees. By translating plans into achievable performance goals, managers can effectively monitor and guide employee performance, ensuring that the organisation remains on track to achieve its strategic objectives.

Measuring actual performance

Performance measurement can be done through various tools and techniques, such as creating dashboards to monitor key performance indicators or conducting periodic check-ins with team members to understand their experiences in implementing the plan. This step also involves analysing any deviations from the set standards and identifying the reasons behind them. For example, in the case of the fictional company, XYZ Group, managers measured the actual performance by obtaining sales and inventory figures for the relevant period and comparing them to the previous period, taking into account various factors such as orders, returns, and defective merchandise.

Additionally, measuring actual performance helps identify areas where the team requires additional support or recognition. For instance, in the sales team example, the sales manager noticed that the team was making good progress towards their goal but was feeling burnt out. The manager then decided to take the team to an MLB baseball game and dinner to celebrate their small victory and boost morale. This demonstrates how measuring actual performance can help managers identify opportunities to motivate and support their teams.

Comparing actual performance with standards

The first step in this process is setting clear, measurable, and attainable performance standards. These standards should be specific and provide a meaningful basis for comparison. Once the standards are defined, accurate data on actual performance needs to be collected consistently. This may involve using performance management software, conducting regular reviews, or gathering feedback from various sources.

The next step is to compare the actual performance data against the set standards, looking for patterns, trends, and deviations. Both quantitative data (such as sales numbers and production rates) and qualitative data (such as customer satisfaction and employee engagement) should be considered. Understanding these gaps helps prioritize areas for improvement and recognize successes.

If performance falls short of the standards, it is crucial to identify the root causes by analyzing internal processes, team dynamics, or external factors. This step helps address the issues effectively and implement corrective actions. These actions should be communicated clearly, and their impact should be tracked to ensure they are effective and aligned with the desired direction.

The controlling function of management involves monitoring, measuring, and comparing actual performance with established standards or objectives. By identifying deviations, managers can take corrective actions and implement strategies to improve efficiency and achieve the desired outcomes.

Overall, comparing actual performance with standards is a fundamental aspect of effective management. It provides the information necessary to hold teams accountable, identify issues early on, make informed decisions, and drive continuous improvement within the organization.

Analysing deviations

When analysing deviations, managers must first establish why standards were not met. This requires a thorough investigation into the underlying causes of the issue. For example, in the case of employee theft, managers at XYZ Group installed cameras and placed locks on cabinets to deter and prevent further incidents. By analysing the deviations from the goal of zero thefts, they were able to identify the specific areas requiring improvement and implement targeted solutions.

The analysis of deviations also helps determine the level of control required and whether adjustments to the standards are necessary. This step involves evaluating the effectiveness of the current control measures and deciding if additional controls need to be implemented or if the standards themselves need to be re-evaluated. For instance, in the XYZ Group case, managers might assess whether the initial controls, such as surveillance cameras and locked cabinets, were sufficient or if further controls are needed to meet the goal.

Additionally, analysing deviations allows managers to distinguish between issues that are within the control of the organisation and those that are not. This distinction is crucial for prioritising efforts and resources effectively. For example, if a company's sales targets are affected by economic downturns or changes in consumer behaviour, managers can identify these external factors and adjust their strategies accordingly.

The analysis of deviations is a dynamic process that requires flexibility and adaptability. Managers must be prepared to continuously monitor and evaluate performance, making adjustments as needed to ensure the organisation's goals remain achievable and realistic. This process is integral to effective management, as it enables leaders to guide their teams towards success, even amidst challenges and unexpected circumstances.

Taking corrective action

For example, consider a company that has experienced a decrease in profits due to employee theft. After setting a goal of zero thefts and implementing initial measures such as installing cameras and adding locks, managers review the sales and inventory figures for the subsequent months. Despite observing some improvement, the goal has not been fully achieved. As a corrective action, the company's senior executives decide to institute a zero-tolerance policy for employee theft, with clear consequences outlined in the employee handbook. This is communicated to all warehouse employees to deter future theft and reinforce the importance of adhering to the established standards.

Corrective actions can also involve adjustments to workflows, allocating resources differently, or providing additional training to address performance gaps. Managers may utilise performance management tools to recommend new courses of action and help employees achieve their objectives. These actions contribute to the overall success of the organisation by ensuring that activities are carried out efficiently and effectively, aligning with the company's goals and vision.

It is important to note that taking corrective action is part of a continuous feedback loop in management. Managers should regularly monitor and evaluate employee performance, comparing it to established standards and goals. This allows them to identify areas where corrective actions may be necessary and make adjustments to keep the organisation on track. Open and transparent communication about performance expectations and deviations is essential to fostering a positive and productive work environment.

In summary, taking corrective action is a crucial aspect of management's monitoring function. It involves identifying deviations from performance standards, analysing the reasons behind them, and implementing solutions to improve processes and behaviours. Corrective actions help organisations stay on course, address challenges, and ensure that activities are carried out effectively and efficiently to achieve their desired goals.

Frequently asked questions