Lindsay Lohan's Ankle Monitor: A Troubled Star's Legal Woes

why did lindsay lohan have an ankle monitor

In 2010, Lindsay Lohan was ordered to wear an alcohol-monitoring ankle bracelet as part of her probation terms for two DUI arrests in 2007. The actress avoided jail time but was required to abstain from alcohol, submit to weekly random drug tests, and attend alcohol education classes. Lohan's ankle monitor was triggered within five days of being fitted, but this was due to a false alarm caused by a battery issue.

Characteristics Values
Reason for ankle monitor Lindsay Lohan was ordered to wear an ankle monitor after missing a mandatory hearing stemming from her 2007 DUI arrest.
Type of ankle monitor Alcohol-monitoring bracelet
Additional conditions Abstain from alcohol, submit to weekly random drug tests, and attend alcohol education classes
Judge Beverly Hills Superior Court Judge Marsha Revel
House arrest duration 35 days

shundigital

Lindsay Lohan's alcohol relapse while wearing an ankle monitor

Lindsay Lohan was ordered to wear an alcohol-monitoring ankle bracelet in 2010 after missing a court hearing. The actress was due in court following a 2007 DUI arrest and a misdemeanour drug charge. Lohan avoided jail but was ordered to abstain from alcohol and wear the monitoring device.

The SCRAM (Secure Continuous Remote Alcohol Monitor) bracelet uses the same technology as a breathalyser, sampling perspiration on the skin every 30 minutes. If alcohol is present, a chemical reaction occurs in the device's fuel cell. The data is then transmitted to the company that makes the device, Alcohol Monitoring Systems Inc., who in turn inform the relevant authority overseeing the patient's recovery.

Despite the ankle bracelet, Lohan relapsed and was arrested for drunken driving. The device is not intended to be a cure for addiction and cannot prevent people from drinking. It also cannot constantly monitor the wearer, as data can only be collected when the wearer is within 30 to 50 feet of a wireless transmitter, usually placed in the person's home.

Lohan's alcohol monitor was also triggered after the 2010 MTV Movie Awards, which she attended and one of the after-parties. Her lawyer said she would look into whether a violation had occurred.

shundigital

The judge's ruling on Lohan's ankle monitor

In 2010, Lindsay Lohan was ordered by Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Marsha Revel to wear an alcohol-monitoring bracelet on her ankle, in addition to attending alcohol education classes and submitting to random drug tests. This ruling came after Lohan missed a mandatory hearing stemming from her 2007 DUI arrest. Lohan claimed that her absence was due to her passport being stolen while she was in France for the Cannes Film Festival. As a result of her failure to appear, Judge Revel issued an arrest warrant, which was recalled after Lohan posted bail, set at $100,000.

During the hearing, Lohan's lawyer argued that the ankle bracelet would interfere with the actress's upcoming photo shoots and movie in Texas. However, Judge Revel showed little sympathy and stated that her ruling would not be changed. She also set a probation violation hearing for July 6 to address Lohan's failure to appear for the previous hearing and her non-attendance of alcohol education classes.

Lohan was required to wear the ankle bracelet as part of her probation parameters, which allowed her to remain free on bond. The bracelet, known as the Secure Continuous Remote Alcohol Monitor (SCRAM), detects alcohol consumption by measuring the evaporation of alcohol from perspiration on the skin. Despite wearing the bracelet, Lohan was arrested for drunken driving, which the manufacturer of the device claimed highlighted its limitations as a deterrent rather than a cure for addiction.

Lohan's ankle monitor also made headlines in 2011 when it was triggered during her 35-day house arrest. However, this turned out to be a false alarm due to a system issue, and no probation violations were discovered.

shundigital

How the ankle monitor works

In 2010, Lindsay Lohan was ordered to wear an ankle monitor as part of her probation. This was due to her failure to appear at a mandatory hearing stemming from a 2007 DUI arrest.

Ankle monitors, also known as ankle bracelets, ankle shackles, or tethers, are electronic monitoring devices that track the location of their wearers. They are typically worn by people who are awaiting trial, serving probation or parole, or facing immigration proceedings. The device is usually attached to the ankle, although in some cases, it may be worn on the wrist for medical reasons.

There are several types of ankle monitors available, each utilizing different technologies for monitoring and tracking. The most common types are:

  • Radio Frequency (RF): This technology uses a transmitter affixed to the ankle or wrist that sends constant radio signals back to a receiver. The receiver requires an electrical power source and a telephone landline to transmit data. Officers are automatically notified if the equipment is tampered with or if the individual enters or leaves a specific location, such as their residence.
  • Cellular Unit or Receiver: This technology is similar to the landline unit but transmits data via a cellular signal, eliminating the need for a telephone landline.
  • Global Positioning System (GPS): GPS trackers are affixed to the ankle and use GPS satellites, cellular towers, and/or Wi-Fi to detect the individual's location. The wearer is required to charge the device daily or as directed. GPS equipment may be preferred when enhanced supervision or monitoring outside of an approved residence is needed.
  • Voice Recognition (VR): This technology uses computerized telephone calls to verify the presence of the individual at their approved location, typically their residence. It requires a telephone landline and does not require an immediate response from officers in the event of a violation.
  • Virtual Monitoring Technology: This method uses a smartphone mobile application to track the individual's whereabouts through location services and identity technology such as facial recognition, fingerprints, or passwords.

Ankle monitors are designed to be worn 24 hours a day and can have a significant impact on the wearer's life. They are often noticeable, leading to social stigma and judgment. Additionally, the restrictions on movement and the need for regular charging can create stress and anxiety for the wearer, affecting their ability to work, attend school, or engage in social activities.

shundigital

Lohan's house arrest

In 2010, Lindsay Lohan was ordered to wear an alcohol-monitoring bracelet on her ankle as part of her probation terms for two DUI arrests in 2007. Lohan was also required to attend alcohol education classes and submit to random drug testing.

Lohan's ankle monitor was triggered five days into her 35-day house arrest in 2011, which she was serving for taking a necklace from a boutique and violating the terms of her 2007 conviction for driving under the influence. However, this turned out to be a false alarm due to a system issue. Lohan stated that she enjoyed being under house arrest as it gave her an opportunity to stay out of the limelight and get work done from home.

shundigital

Lohan's avoidance of jail time

Lindsay Lohan avoided jail time and a warrant for her arrest by posting bail of $100,000 and agreeing to comply with a judge's new, stricter probation parameters. Lohan was initially arrested for a DUI in 2007 and was required to attend court-ordered alcohol education classes. However, she missed a mandatory hearing in 2010, claiming that her passport had been stolen while she was in France. As a result, a judge issued a warrant for her arrest, which was later recalled after Lohan posted bail.

To avoid jail time, Lohan was ordered to abstain from alcohol, wear an alcohol-monitoring ankle bracelet, and submit to weekly random drug tests. She was also required to continue her alcohol education classes and was placed under house arrest for 35 days. The ankle bracelet was meant to monitor her alcohol consumption and ensure she remained sober. However, Lohan relapsed while wearing the bracelet, demonstrating its limitations as a deterrent.

Lohan's ankle monitor was set off within five days of her house arrest, but it was a false alarm due to a system issue. During her house arrest, Lohan was monitored by probation officials who could enter her home at any time to ensure she was in compliance with the requirements. Despite the strict conditions of her probation, Lohan reportedly enjoyed her time under house arrest as it allowed her to stay out of the public eye and focus on her work.

Best Monitors for Your Home Office Setup

You may want to see also

Frequently asked questions

Lindsay Lohan was ordered to wear an ankle monitor as part of her probation terms after she failed to appear for a mandatory hearing stemming from her 2007 DUI arrest.

Lindsay Lohan had to wear an alcohol-monitoring bracelet, abstain from alcohol, submit to weekly random drug tests, and attend alcohol education classes.

Yes, Lindsay Lohan's ankle monitor went off five days into her 35-day house arrest. However, it was a false alarm due to a system issue.

The Secure Continuous Remote Alcohol Monitor (SCRAM) detects whether a person has been drinking by measuring the evaporation of alcohol from perspiration on the skin's surface. The data is then transmitted to the company's field operations personnel, who in turn furnish the information to a probation officer or a counsellor.

Written by
Reviewed by
Share this post
Print
Did this article help you?

Leave a comment