Battery Offenders: Do First-Timers Get Ankle Monitors?

The use of GPS ankle monitors as an alternative to incarceration is on the rise in the US. Courts may order first offenders of battery to wear an ankle monitor if they are deemed a low-risk offender, or if they are awaiting trial and are not considered a danger to the community. Ankle monitors are also used as a condition of probation or parole, or if the offender has health issues. The monitor tracks the wearer's location and movements, and they are monitored 24 hours a day. The device also ensures that the wearer stays within a set boundary or curfew, and can notify authorities if the wearer enters an exclusion zone.

Ankle monitors are used as an alternative to incarceration

Ankle monitors are increasingly being used as an alternative to incarceration, particularly during the pandemic when prisons became coronavirus hotspots. They are typically used for individuals on probation or parole, or those awaiting trial. They can also be used for people convicted of a crime who are considered low-risk and not a danger to the community.

Ankle monitors are seen as a more humane alternative to incarceration, allowing individuals to remain in their community, maintain their jobs, and support their families. They are also less expensive than keeping someone in jail or prison.

However, a report by Kate Weisburd, an associate professor of law at George Washington University, found that ankle monitors cause many of the same harms associated with traditional incarceration. The report highlights how electronic monitoring deprives people of fundamental rights, violates privacy, extracts wealth, jeopardizes employment, and undermines family and social relationships.

Weisburd's report also found that ankle monitors are keeping people connected to the prison system longer, with more people remaining on the devices for over a year. The use of ankle monitors has widened, and critics argue that while they may be preferable for people hoping to get out of jail, they do not address the systemic issues that lead to incarceration.

Ankle monitors are often subject to strict rules and regulations, and any violation can result in additional penalties or incarceration. For example, failure to keep the device charged or charged for a specific amount of time could result in jail time. The rules are often vague and open to interpretation, leading to set-ups for failure and reincarceration.

In conclusion, while ankle monitors can be a viable alternative to incarceration in certain cases, they should be used with discretion, considering the offender's risk of reoffending and the nature of the crime. They are not a replacement for traditional imprisonment but a complement to it, and their use should be carefully evaluated to ensure they do not cause unintended harm.

They are used to ensure the wearer doesn't get into more trouble

Ankle monitors are often used to ensure the wearer doesn't get into more trouble. They are usually worn by people who are awaiting trial and are considered a danger to the community or a flight risk. By ensuring the wearer remains within a certain radius of their home, the monitor helps them abide by their bond terms and avoid jail time.

Ankle monitors are also used as an alternative to pre-trial detention or as a condition of probation. In the case of DUI or DWI convictions, for example, the monitor can detect alcohol levels, ensuring compliance with court orders not to drink. This helps the wearer avoid further penalties, including jail time.

In addition, ankle monitors can be used to maintain a required distance between the offender and the victim in domestic violence cases. This helps to ensure the offender doesn't reoffend and protects the victim from further harm.

For first-time and non-violent offenders, ankle monitors provide an alternative to jail time, allowing them to serve their sentence through house arrest or monitored sentences. By wearing an ankle monitor, these offenders can avoid the negative impacts of incarceration while still paying their debt to society.

Courts may require first offenders to wear ankle monitors as a condition of bail

The use of ankle monitors ensures that the individual adheres to specific rules and regulations set by the court, such as maintaining a required distance from the victim in cases of domestic violence or refraining from drinking alcohol in DUI cases. The device can track the wearer's location and movements, and in some cases, even monitor their alcohol consumption through sweat analysis. Failure to comply with the set conditions can result in additional penalties, including jail time.

The specific type of ankle monitor assigned depends on the individual's risk factors, assessed by a parole officer. The three main types of ankle monitors are RF/Radio Frequency monitors, GPS monitors, and SCRAM (Secure Continuous Remote Alcohol Monitoring) monitors. RF monitors enforce curfews and detect when the wearer is within a certain range of their home, while GPS monitors track the wearer's location more freely, allowing them to move within designated inclusion and exclusion zones. SCRAM monitors are specifically designed to monitor alcohol consumption and are often used for DUI offenders.

In addition to the restrictions on movement and alcohol consumption, ankle monitors also come with other rules that the wearer must follow. This includes meeting with their probation or parole officer at scheduled times, paying all court fees, and abstaining from drugs. Failure to comply with any of these conditions can result in serious consequences, including arrest and jail time.

While ankle monitors offer an alternative to incarceration, they also introduce financial burdens and restrictions on the wearer's daily life. The wearer is typically responsible for the cost of the device, including installation and monitoring fees, which can amount to hundreds of dollars per month. Additionally, the bulkiness and constant charging requirements of the device can impact the wearer's ability to work, socialise, and perform daily activities.

Offenders must pay for their ankle monitors

Offenders who are required to wear an ankle monitor as a condition of their release or probation often have to pay for the device and its installation, as well as ongoing monitoring fees. These costs can be significant, sometimes amounting to hundreds of dollars for installation and hundreds of dollars per month for monitoring services. In some cases, the wearer may also be charged a setup fee, daily use fee, or activation fee. These costs are in addition to any fines and fees associated with their case.

The rationale behind requiring offenders to pay for their ankle monitors is that it helps to offset the cost of monitoring and supervision, which would otherwise be borne by the state or local municipality. By passing the cost onto the offender, governments can save money and avoid increasing taxes or cutting services to cover the expense of the monitoring program.

However, there is criticism that this cost-shifting can create a financial burden for offenders, who may already be struggling economically. This is especially true for offenders who are awaiting trial and have not yet been convicted of a crime. In some cases, offenders who cannot afford to pay for their ankle monitors may end up back in jail, even if they have not committed any additional crimes. This raises concerns about equal justice and the effectiveness of ankle monitors as a rehabilitative tool.

There is also the question of whether ankle monitors are effective in reducing recidivism and improving outcomes for offenders. Some argue that ankle monitors can be helpful in certain situations, such as for high-risk offenders or those who have committed serious or violent crimes. However, others argue that ankle monitors do not address the underlying issues that lead to criminal behavior, such as unemployment, poverty, and structural racism.

Ultimately, the effectiveness of ankle monitors as a criminal justice tool is still debated, and the question of who should pay for them remains a complex and controversial issue.

Ankle monitors can be used to enforce curfews

Ankle monitors are often used as a way to enforce curfews, especially for those on house arrest, probation, or parole. The devices are used to track an individual's location and movements, usually through GPS technology, and ensure they remain within a designated area during their curfew. If a person goes beyond this specific perimeter, the monitor will alert the relevant authorities.

In the context of enforcing curfews, ankle monitors are often seen as a less harsh alternative to incarceration. They allow individuals to remain free while awaiting trial or as a condition of their probation. For example, in the state of Florida, DUI offenders are often required to wear an ankle monitor as part of their probation, which can help them avoid jail time.

The use of ankle monitors to enforce curfews can be applied to various types of offenders, including those charged with serious crimes like murder, sexual assault, or major drug offenses. Additionally, repeat offenders or those who have violated bail or parole terms in the past may also be subject to ankle monitoring to provide an extra layer of supervision.

In some cases, ankle monitors are used to enforce curfews for individuals released from indefinite immigration detention. This was seen in Australia, where the government imposed ankle monitors and strict curfews on serious criminals, including murderers and sex offenders, who were released into the community after a High Court ruling that their indefinite detention was unlawful.

Overall, ankle monitors are a tool that can be used to enforce curfews and manage an individual's movements as part of their sentence or release conditions.

Frequently asked questions