Inglewood Traffic Cameras: Red Light Secrets Revealed

Inglewood, California, has a history of using red light cameras, with the City of Inglewood previously operating a red light camera program. While the program was closed in 2014, historical data and maps indicate the presence of red light cameras at various intersections, including Centinela Avenue and Beach Avenue, Prairie and 111th, and Rosecrans and Hindry. The effectiveness of these cameras in Inglewood has been the subject of legal debates, with cases reaching the California Supreme Court.

Inglewood, California, has red light traffic cameras

The city's red light camera system was provided by RedFlex, and the tickets were issued by the Los Angeles County Sheriff, under contract with the City. The contract included an illegal "cost neutrality" clause, which meant that the city did not have to pay RedFlex the full rent if there weren't enough fines to cover the cost.

In 2014, Inglewood closed its red light camera program. However, as of 2024, there are still red light cameras in operation in Inglewood.

The city's police department operates the cameras, which are maintained by Redflex Traffic System, Inc

Inglewood, California, located just east of LAX, has a number of red light traffic cameras installed in the city. The Inglewood Police Department operates these cameras, which are maintained by Redflex Traffic System, Inc.

Redflex Traffic System, Inc. provides the technical expertise and maintenance for the cameras, while the Inglewood Police Department is responsible for their operation and oversight. This includes selecting the intersections where camera installation is warranted, reviewing footage, and issuing citations.

The red light cameras in Inglewood have been the subject of some controversy. In one notable case, a citation was issued to Carmen Goldsmith in 2009, who was found guilty and fined $435. Goldsmith appealed the conviction, arguing that the evidence from the red light camera system was not properly authenticated and constituted hearsay. However, the California Supreme Court upheld the original decision, finding that the evidence was admissible and that the photographs and video evidence did not constitute hearsay as they were not statements made by a person.

In addition to the legal issues, there have also been concerns raised about the effectiveness of the red light camera system in Inglewood. Some residents have questioned the lack of warning signs at certain intersections, and there have been reports of missing or obstructed signs.

While the red light cameras in Inglewood are still operational, the city of Los Angeles has decided to stop pursuing unpaid red light camera tickets. This means that drivers who receive a red light camera ticket in Inglewood may still have to pay the fine, but those with outstanding tickets in Los Angeles may no longer be pursued for payment.

The city pursued a case against Carmen Goldsmith in 2009, who was fined $435

Inglewood, California, has an extensive network of red-light traffic cameras. The city's website provides a map of all installed and operating red-light cameras, with additional data available upon request.

In 2009, the City of Inglewood issued a citation to Carmen Goldsmith, using its automated traffic enforcement system (ATES). ATES captured three photographs and a 12-second video of Goldsmith's vehicle crossing the intersection of Centinela Avenue and Beach Avenue.

Goldsmith challenged the citation in the Inglewood Superior Court, demanding a trial. However, she lost the case when Dean Young, an investigator with the Inglewood Police Department, testified. Young had over six years of experience in red light camera enforcement and explained the workings of the ATES, which was operated by the Inglewood Police Department and maintained by Redflex Traffic System, Inc.

Young's testimony authenticated the evidence by explaining how the cameras worked and what the "Data Strip" showed and recorded. He also testified about conducting a timing check on the light, finding that the yellow light phase lasted four seconds, which was above the minimum requirement.

Based on this evidence, the trial judge found Goldsmith guilty and imposed a fine of $435. Goldsmith appealed the conviction, first to the appellate division and then to the California Supreme Court, arguing that the ATES evidence was not properly authenticated and constituted hearsay. However, the California Supreme Court upheld the trial court's ruling, finding no abuse of discretion in admitting the ATES evidence.

The case, known as "People v. Carmen Goldsmith," set a precedent for the admissibility of red-light camera evidence and the applicability of hearsay rules in California.

Inglewood tickets do not have to be paid, but non-payment may result in threatening letters from the court

Inglewood in California has a number of red light cameras installed across the city. The city's red light camera program was closed in January 2014.

If you receive a red light camera ticket in Inglewood, you don't have to pay it and non-payment will not be reported to the DMV. However, you may receive threatening letters from the court. These letters can be ignored, but it's important to note that this only applies to camera tickets. If you receive a ticket from a police officer, ignoring it could result in further consequences.

It's worth noting that the red light camera at Rosecrans and Hindry in Hawthorne, near the Costco, is particularly active. This camera is operated by the City of Hawthorne and its police department, and they have issued thousands of tickets at this location.

While you may choose to ignore a red light camera ticket from Inglewood, there are other options as well. You could pay the fine, although this is essentially pleading guilty and can lead to points on your license and increased insurance rates. Alternatively, you could contest the ticket by requesting a trial or using a trial by written declaration, where you submit a written defense without appearing in court.

Inglewood closed its red light camera program in 2014

Inglewood, California, closed its red-light camera program in 2014. The city's red-light camera tickets were issued by the Inglewood Police Department and maintained by Redflex Traffic System, Inc.

The program was closed on January 17, 2014, with the only public announcement being an entry in the city's budget. This decision meant that the city would no longer pursue drivers with unpaid red-light camera tickets, which typically carried fines of several hundred dollars per violation.

While the red-light cameras were turned off in Inglewood, they continued to operate in other parts of Los Angeles County, including Beverly Hills, West Hollywood, Culver City, Hawthorne, and Torrance.

The closure of Inglewood's red-light camera program in 2014 was a significant development, as it ended the city's use of automated traffic enforcement systems and the associated fines.

Frequently asked questions