Car Cameras In Kansas: Are They Legal?

Dashcams and car cameras are an increasingly popular addition to vehicles, but are car cameras legal in Kansas? The answer is a little complicated. Kansas law is silent on the use of cameras to enforce traffic laws, and there are no state laws or programs for speed or red-light cameras. However, toll agencies, including the Kansas Turnpike Authority, use video enforcement for toll collection. While there are no explicit laws prohibiting car cameras, Kansas has a hidden camera law that forbids the recording and disclosure of intercepted images without consent. The state also has laws regarding the placement of cameras in private locations, including restrictions on capturing people in a state of undress.

Kansas law does not prohibit car cameras

The use of cameras for traffic enforcement has been a topic of discussion in Kansas, particularly in Kansas City. While some residents support the idea of using cameras to improve road safety and reduce accidents, others have raised concerns about the legality and effectiveness of such measures. Kansas City, Missouri, suspended the use of red-light cameras in 2012, and the state of Missouri ruled them unconstitutional in 2015. However, with the recent increase in traffic fatalities, there have been discussions about re-evaluating the use of red-light cameras in the community.

It is important to note that while Kansas law does not specifically prohibit car cameras, there are laws in place regarding the use of hidden or concealed cameras. Kansas has a hidden camera law that forbids the recording and disclosure of intercepted images without the consent of the involved parties. This law applies to the use of concealed camcorders, motion picture cameras, or other electronic devices to secretly photograph or record another person without their knowledge or consent in situations where there is an expectation of privacy.

When it comes to placing security cameras on your home in Kansas, it is advisable to ensure that the cameras are outdoors, visible, and marked. This helps to avoid any legal issues related to privacy and secret recordings. Additionally, audio recording on home security cameras can be risky, as most states require individuals to obtain permission from all parties involved in a conversation before recording.

Cameras can be used to enforce traffic laws

Traffic enforcement cameras are an effective tool for enforcing traffic laws and improving road safety. These cameras are typically mounted beside or over a road or installed in an enforcement vehicle to monitor and detect motoring offences, including speeding, running red lights, and unauthorized use of bus lanes. The use of these cameras for traffic enforcement is authorized by state statutes in 36 states and the District of Columbia, with varying policies and regulations in place.

One of the primary benefits of traffic enforcement cameras is their ability to reduce accidents and injuries on the road. Studies have shown that speed cameras, in particular, can lead to a significant reduction in fatal and serious injury crashes. For example, a worldwide review of studies found an 11% to 44% decrease in crashes resulting in fatalities or severe injuries due to speed cameras. Additionally, the British Medical Journal reported that speed cameras effectively reduced accidents and injuries and recommended their wider deployment.

Another advantage of traffic enforcement cameras is their ability to act as a force multiplier for law enforcement agencies. They can help reduce behaviours that put lives and property at risk by deterring speeding, red-light running, and other traffic violations. This not only improves road safety but also reduces the workload on law enforcement officers, allowing them to focus on other critical tasks.

While the use of traffic enforcement cameras has been controversial, with concerns raised about privacy and surveillance, the positive impact on road safety cannot be overlooked. Proponents of camera enforcement argue that it can help save lives and reduce the economic costs associated with crashes and injuries. Additionally, the data captured by these cameras can be used to identify problem areas and implement targeted solutions to improve traffic flow and safety.

In Kansas, while there are currently no state laws or programs for speed or red-light cameras, bills have been introduced to authorize the use of cameras on school buses to identify vehicles passing when the stop arm is extended. This demonstrates a recognition of the potential benefits of traffic enforcement cameras in improving safety, especially around school buses.

Kansas has no state law on speeding or red-light cameras

However, it is worth noting that Kansas law does not explicitly prohibit the use of cameras for traffic enforcement. Cameras are statutorily authorized for use by municipalities in 36 states and the District of Columbia for enforcing traffic laws, particularly those related to speeding, full stops at red lights, and passing stopped school buses. While Kansas is not included in this group of states, it also does not have any laws prohibiting the use of cameras for these purposes.

The lack of state-level regulation on camera use for traffic enforcement in Kansas may be due to a variety of factors. Some proponents of camera enforcement argue that it can help reduce behaviours that put lives and property at risk. They believe that cameras can act as a force multiplier for law enforcement agencies, providing additional eyes on the road to deter and capture traffic violations.

On the other hand, opponents of camera enforcement have raised valid concerns about the potential misuse of enforcement without a law enforcement officer present. They argue that camera enforcement could be used for surveillance or as a revenue-raising tool for local governments rather than solely for the purpose of improving road safety.

While Kansas has no state law on speeding or red-light cameras, individual municipalities within the state may have their own regulations regarding the use of cameras for traffic enforcement. It is important for drivers to be aware of any local laws or programs that may be in place and to abide by them to avoid penalties.

Kansas City drivers are divided over the return of red-light cameras

Kansas City is divided over the return of red-light cameras, with some residents supporting the proposal and others raising concerns about its legality and effectiveness.

The Case for Red-Light Cameras

Some Kansas City drivers support the return of red-light cameras as a way to improve road safety and reduce the number of traffic fatalities. They argue that the cameras can help identify people who are committing crimes and causing accidents, making the roads safer for everyone.

One resident, Regina Taylor, welcomed the idea of red-light cameras as a means to capture people who are breaking the law and endangering lives. She said, "If it's for capturing people who are committing crimes and causing someone to lose their life, absolutely." This view is shared by Paulette Peasley, whose son was killed by a drunk driver. Peasley believes that red-light cameras can help hold people accountable for their actions, stating, "If you're running a red light, or doing stupid things, then you deserve to be caught."

Mayor Quinton Lucas is a proponent of bringing back red-light cameras to Kansas City. He initiated the conversation by asking his followers on Twitter: "With fatality auto crashes reaching new highs, what are your thoughts on returning red light cameras to the community like what's being evaluated in St. Louis?" Lucas is concerned about the rising number of traffic deaths in the city, which has surpassed 100 in recent years. He sees red-light cameras as one part of a broader strategy to improve road safety, which also includes initiatives like Vision Zero to reduce speeding and make roads safer for pedestrians.

The Case Against Red-Light Cameras

However, not all Kansas City residents are on board with the idea. Some people have concerns about the legality and effectiveness of red-light cameras. Lynsay Beck, a Kansas City driver, believes that the use of red-light cameras is unconstitutional. She questions the accuracy of the technology, asking, "What if it wasn't me driving the vehicle?" Beck and other opponents of the cameras also worry about the financial implications, arguing that taxpayer money could be better spent on improving road design and infrastructure.

Charon Thompson, another Kansas City driver, shared a similar sentiment. She recalled the inconvenience and cost of having to take time off work to dispute tickets issued by the red-light cameras. "I took off work 10 to 20 times just to get these tickets dismissed because the turn I was doing was right off the highway," Thompson said.

In addition to these concerns, there is a legal precedent for the removal of red-light cameras in Kansas City. In 2015, the Missouri Supreme Court ruled that the use of red-light cameras in two cities was invalid because they assumed the car's owner was the one driving, shifting the burden of proof to the defendant. This ruling led to the discontinuation of the red-light camera program in Kansas City, which had been in place from 2009 to 2013.

Moving Forward

Despite the divided opinions among Kansas City drivers, there has been no official announcement about the reintroduction of red-light cameras. Mayor Lucas has stated that any proposal to bring back the cameras would involve a thorough conversation about people's civil rights and a long legal process. In the meantime, the city is exploring other strategies to improve road safety, such as reducing speeds, improving visibility, and providing traffic safety education.

Kansas law forbids hidden cameras

The state also has a hidden camera law, which forbids the recording and disclosure of intercepted images. It is illegal to install or use a concealed camera to secretly photograph, film, or record another identifiable person without their consent or knowledge. This includes recording someone who is in a nude state and has a reasonable expectation of privacy, such as in a restroom.

Kansas law also prohibits the use of hidden cameras for viewing another person's body, undergarments, or invading their privacy. For example, it is illegal to aim a surveillance camera into an area of a neighbor's home where there is an expectation of privacy, such as an interior window or bedroom.

Violations of these laws can result in criminal charges, including misdemeanor and felony offenses, with penalties including court fines and potential jail time.

Frequently asked questions