Traffic Cameras: Facial Recognition Or Not?

Facial recognition technology is becoming increasingly prevalent in modern society, with up to 6 million closed-circuit television (CCTV) cameras in Britain alone. This equates to one camera for every 11 people in the country, giving it the third-highest penetration rate in the world after only America and China. With such a dense network of cameras, facial recognition technology has the potential to be used for a variety of purposes, including traffic enforcement. Corsight AI, a leading facial recognition technology provider, has recently launched a new technology that can work even in challenging conditions such as face coverings and poor weather. This technology has the potential to be used in traffic enforcement, as it can operate through car windshields to identify the driver of a vehicle.

Facial recognition technology is being used by law enforcement agencies to identify individuals in large crowds

Facial recognition technology has been a point of discussion and controversy in recent years, with law enforcement agencies utilising this technology to identify individuals in large crowds. While some argue that this technology aids in policing and monitoring, others express concerns about privacy and the potential for inaccurate identifications, particularly among Black and Hispanic adults.

Facial recognition technology has been employed by various law enforcement agencies, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the U.S. Secret Service, to support criminal investigations. This technology enables officers to swiftly search through billions of photos to identify unknown suspects. However, civil rights and civil liberties advocates caution that overreliance on facial recognition could lead to the arrest and prosecution of innocent individuals.

The use of facial recognition technology by law enforcement agencies has sparked debates about its impact on privacy and civil liberties. Some argue that it infringes on people's reasonable expectation of privacy in public spaces. Additionally, there are concerns about the accuracy of this technology, especially when it comes to identifying people of colour. Studies have found that commercial facial recognition algorithms have higher misidentification rates for women with darker skin tones compared to men with lighter skin.

To address these concerns, some technology companies, such as Amazon, Microsoft, and IBM, have pledged to stop selling facial recognition technologies to law enforcement agencies. Furthermore, several states and municipalities in the U.S., including Boston, San Francisco, and Virginia, have established limitations on the use of facial recognition by law enforcement. These regulations aim to protect civil rights and reduce the potential for inaccurate identifications, particularly in marginalised communities.

While facial recognition technology offers benefits in law enforcement, it also raises important ethical questions and concerns about civil liberties. As a result, there have been calls for guardrails and increased training for law enforcement agencies to prevent unfair or inaccurate profiling and to ensure that this technology is used appropriately and equitably.

Facial recognition software can be used with traffic cameras to identify drivers

Facial recognition software has been a topic of discussion and development since the 1960s. In recent years, it has been used in various sectors, including law enforcement, and there are ongoing debates about its effectiveness and ethical implications. Facial recognition systems are now being used in conjunction with traffic cameras to identify drivers and enforce traffic rules.

Shenzhen, China, for example, has implemented a network of facial recognition surveillance cameras to identify and fine traffic violators, including those driving without a valid license. The system captures photos of vehicles that break traffic rules and uses facial recognition technology to identify the driver from the police database. This technology has also been used to identify and apprehend a fugitive in a crowd of about 50,000 people at a pop concert in southeast China.

Corsight AI, a leading facial recognition technology provider, has developed a system that can work under challenging conditions, such as face coverings and poor weather. Their technology can even operate through car windshields, which suggests the possibility of using it with traditional ALPR enforcement to automatically identify the driver of a vehicle. While Corsight is not currently used in traffic enforcement, tests have been successful, and there is potential for future implementation.

The use of facial recognition technology in traffic enforcement raises concerns about privacy and the potential for incorrect identifications. There have been instances where facial recognition technology has struggled to distinguish faces of people with dark skin, leading to concerns about racial profiling and the potential for misidentifying individuals. Additionally, there is a lack of transparency and regulation regarding the use of this technology, which has sparked debates about the need for stricter guidelines and informed consent from citizens.

Despite these concerns, the use of facial recognition software in traffic cameras can be a powerful tool for identifying drivers and enforcing traffic rules. It remains a topic of discussion and development, with ongoing improvements in accuracy and performance driving its potential for wider adoption in the future.

Facial recognition can be used to identify and track individuals at protests

Facial recognition technology has been increasingly used to identify and track individuals at protests, raising concerns about the impact on freedom of expression and assembly. This technology enables authorities to capture people's identities en masse, undermining the traditional anonymity and protection provided by large-scale protests.

Facial recognition technology has been deployed in various countries to monitor and track protesters. For instance, in Russia, there have been numerous accounts of individuals being identified and detained using facial recognition, such as Yulia Zhivtsova, who was detained by police due to her previous participation in anti-war protests. Similarly, in India, authorities used this technology to identify participants in farmers' protests, threatening to cancel their passports.

The use of facial recognition technology at protests is often secretive, and those arrested may not be aware of its role in their detention. This technology is also used to analyse images and videos of protests posted on social media, enabling the identification of individuals who may not have been present at the protest site.

The consequences of being identified through facial recognition can be severe, ranging from detention and fines to the creation of databases of dissenters, which can be used for future surveillance and targeting. In some cases, individuals have been charged with "discrediting the military" or similar offences, leading to significant penalties.

Protesters have employed various tactics to counter facial recognition, such as wearing face masks, balaclavas, or makeup designed to confuse algorithms. However, the constant evolution of this technology may render these methods less effective over time.

The use of facial recognition technology in protests raises ethical and legal questions, with privacy advocates arguing that it poses unprecedented threats to privacy and safety. There are also concerns about the potential for mission creep, with surveillance technology becoming more pervasive and required in various contexts.

The use of facial recognition technology by police is spreading in Britain

Britain already has up to 6 million closed-circuit television (CCTV) cameras, which equates to one camera for every 11 people in the country. This is the third-highest penetration rate globally, after America and China. In the wake of the violent protests and riots that swept through parts of the country in early August 2024, police officers have been collecting footage from shops and mosques that were vandalized to identify rioters.

Some police departments are releasing CCTV footage to the public to help identify suspects, while others are using facial recognition technology to achieve the same goal. Facial recognition technology involves linking cameras to databases containing photos of people, and then checking images from the cameras against these photos to see if they match.

The Metropolitan Police and South Wales Police have both experimented with this technology, believing it can help combat crime and terrorism. However, in some cases, courts have ruled against the way police have used facial recognition, and how they have dealt with infringements of privacy rights. There are also concerns about racial bias in the use of this technology.

A report from the Minderoo Centre for Technology and Democracy at the University of Cambridge concluded that the use of live facial recognition technology by police in public spaces is unlawful and unethical, and that it should be banned. The report's author, Evani Radiya-Dixit, emphasized the need to protect human rights and improve accountability in the use of technology, stating that current police use of facial recognition fails to meet minimum ethical and legal standards.

Despite these concerns, the technology is seen by some within British law enforcement as a potentially significant crime-fighting innovation, similar to the introduction of fingerprints. Critics, however, warn of potential abuses of human rights, including the rights to protest and freedom of assembly.

Facial recognition technology can now overcome issues such as face coverings and poor weather

Facial recognition technology has become an integral part of Human Activity Recognition (HAR) applications, which include identity authentication, video monitoring, and surveillance. While this technology has been used in various contexts, one of its potential applications is in traffic enforcement.

Corsight AI, a leading facial recognition technology provider, has recently launched a new technology that can overcome common issues associated with facial recognition, such as face coverings and poor weather conditions. This advanced facial recognition technology has been rated as the top-performing Western-based facial recognition by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).

One of the key advantages of Corsight's technology is its ability to work in challenging conditions. It can accurately identify individuals, even when they are wearing protective face masks or other coverings, and it is also effective in low-light or extreme weather conditions. This makes it a valuable tool for local law enforcement, government agencies, and transportation authorities, especially in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, where face coverings have become mandatory in public spaces.

The technology is also camera and hardware agnostic, meaning it can easily integrate with any existing security system. It has been tested at speeds of over 100km per hour and has shown good results, indicating its potential for traffic enforcement. While there are still challenges, such as reflection and light glare, accurate facial recognition is already possible with cameras mounted at the correct position.

In addition to its use in transport, Corsight is currently employed by airport authorities to identify persons of interest and at car park entrances of critical infrastructure buildings to ensure only authorised personnel are granted entry. With its advanced capabilities, Corsight's facial recognition technology has the potential to be utilised in traffic enforcement, working in conjunction with traditional ALPR enforcement to automatically identify the driver of a vehicle, even through car windshields.

The development of this technology showcases the advancements in artificial intelligence and its potential to enhance security and protection for citizens. However, it is important to consider the ethical implications of such technology and how it can be utilised in a way that benefits society while respecting privacy and data protection.

Frequently asked questions