Ankle Monitors: Reusable Or One-Time Use?

Ankle monitors are electronic devices used to track an individual's movements and location using GPS technology. They are worn around the ankle and are often used as an alternative to traditional imprisonment, allowing individuals to serve their sentences while remaining in the community. Ankle monitors are typically used for individuals on probation or parole or those awaiting trial. They are also used for individuals convicted of a crime but are considered low-risk and not a danger to the community. While ankle monitors offer advantages such as reduced costs and the ability for individuals to maintain their jobs and support their families, they also have disadvantages, including discomfort and skin irritation. Additionally, individuals with ankle monitors are subject to strict rules and regulations, and any violation can result in additional penalties or imprisonment. The effectiveness of ankle monitors in reducing recidivism and their impact on privacy and human rights have been the subject of debate.

Ankle monitors are used as an alternative to imprisonment, allowing individuals to remain in the community

The use of ankle monitors has been rising, with a 140% increase in the number of active monitors between 2005 and 2015. This increase can be attributed to the technology's effectiveness in reducing the risk of individuals absconding and reoffending. During the COVID-19 pandemic, ankle monitors were also used as an alternative to incarceration to slow the spread of the virus in prisons and jails.

Ankle monitors are usually employed for individuals deemed low-risk and not a danger to the community. They are often subject to specific conditions set by the court, such as adhering to a curfew, avoiding certain people or areas, or refraining from alcohol consumption. The monitors use GPS technology to track the individual's movements and location, ensuring they stay within the designated boundaries.

While ankle monitors offer advantages such as reduced costs compared to imprisonment and the ability for individuals to maintain community ties, they also come with certain disadvantages. These include discomfort, skin irritation, and strict rules and regulations that, if violated, can result in additional penalties or imprisonment.

It is important to note that ankle monitors should be used with discretion, considering the offender's risk of recidivism and the nature of the crime. They are not a replacement for traditional imprisonment but rather a complement to it, providing an extra option for criminal defense counsel.

They are typically used for people on probation or parole, or those awaiting trial

Ankle monitors are often used as an alternative to traditional imprisonment, allowing individuals to serve their sentences while remaining in the community. They are typically used for people on probation or parole, or those awaiting trial.

Ankle monitors are usually worn by individuals who are considered low-risk and not a danger to the community. They can be used as a condition of bail or probation, or as an alternative to pre-trial detention. For example, in the case of a DUI defendant, a judge may offer bail and the option to wear an ankle monitor instead of spending time in jail.

The devices are typically used to ensure that individuals do not risk getting into more trouble and to make sure they stay within the boundaries set by the court. For instance, a person with an ankle monitor may have to stay within a certain radius of their home or maintain a required distance from a victim or another individual. They may also have to regularly check in with their probation officer.

Ankle monitors are often used for serious crimes such as murder, sexual assault, or major drug offenses, as well as for repeat offenders or individuals with a history of reoffending. In some cases, ankle monitors can be used to detect alcohol levels and ensure that individuals comply with court orders not to drink.

The use of ankle monitors can provide several advantages over traditional imprisonment. They are less expensive than keeping an individual in jail or prison, and they allow individuals to maintain their jobs and support their families. Ankle monitors can also make it easier for individuals to reintegrate into society once their sentences are completed.

Ankle monitors are also used in healthcare settings and in immigration contexts

Ankle monitors are used in a variety of settings, including healthcare and immigration contexts. In healthcare, electronic tagging can be used to monitor the whereabouts of patients with dementia or Alzheimer's disease, helping to prevent them from wandering off and getting lost or injured. However, this practice has sparked controversy over concerns about patient safety, privacy, and human rights.

In immigration contexts, ankle monitors are used as an alternative to detention for individuals undergoing deportation proceedings or awaiting trial. For example, in the United States, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) uses ankle monitors as part of its Intensive Supervision Appearance Program (ISAP). This program, contracted to private corporations, allows for the tracking and monitoring of individuals. The monitors are equipped with GPS capabilities and can broadcast pre-programmed audio messages.

The use of ankle monitors in immigration settings has been praised by some as a more humane approach compared to detention. It also comes at a lower cost to the government, with electronic monitoring costing about a sixth of the price of immigrant detention per day. However, critics argue that ankle monitors contribute to the expansion of the immigration-incarceration-industrial complex, subjecting individuals to surveillance and restriction of movement.

The experience of wearing an ankle monitor can be stressful and stigmatizing, causing social isolation and exacerbating mental health issues. Additionally, the fees associated with these monitors can pose a significant financial burden, particularly for households with members returning from incarceration.

The devices can be uncomfortable and cause skin irritation

Ankle monitors are often uncomfortable to wear and can cause skin irritation. The devices are strapped tightly to the ankle, and the wearer must be careful to avoid anything too tight or constricting around the monitor, as this can lead to chafing and skin irritation. The tightness of the strap can be difficult to get right, as it needs to be tight enough that the device doesn't slip off but not so tight that it restricts ankle movement.

The discomfort and irritation caused by ankle monitors can be mitigated to some extent by taking certain precautions. For example, it is recommended that individuals wear loose-fitting clothing and apply lotion to the skin around the monitor to prevent dryness. Additionally, a soft adhesive padding called moleskin can be used to keep the monitor in place and reduce chafing.

Despite these measures, ankle monitors can still cause significant discomfort and skin irritation for some individuals. This can be a particular problem for those who are required to wear the devices for extended periods, such as Shannan Davis, a 43-year-old woman from Michigan who was placed on an ankle monitor as a condition of her temporary release from jail. Davis reported that the monitor was initially too loose, causing the cord to wrap around her leg and twist up in knots. When officials tightened the monitor, it became too tight, causing discomfort and fear that it might break.

The discomfort and skin irritation caused by ankle monitors can significantly impact an individual's quality of life. In some cases, it may even hinder their ability to carry out daily tasks or participate in certain activities. As such, it is important for individuals wearing ankle monitors to carefully follow the recommended precautions to minimise discomfort and irritation as much as possible.

They are less expensive than imprisonment and allow individuals to maintain their jobs

Ankle monitors are a cost-effective alternative to imprisonment, allowing individuals to maintain their employment and support their families. They are often used for those on probation or parole, or those awaiting trial. This method of supervision enables people to serve their sentences while remaining in the community, which can aid their reintegration into society.

The use of ankle monitors is significantly cheaper than keeping someone in jail or prison. In addition to reducing costs for the criminal justice system, ankle monitors also allow individuals to continue working and earning an income. This means they can support themselves and their families, and avoid the financial strain that imprisonment can cause.

Ankle monitors are also beneficial for individuals who need to care for their families, as they can remain at home and maintain their daily responsibilities. This stability can be particularly important for those with children or other dependents, as it allows them to avoid the disruptions caused by incarceration.

Furthermore, ankle monitors can provide individuals with the opportunity to continue their education. This can be especially valuable for young offenders, as they can avoid the negative impact of dropping out of school and can work towards a better future.

While ankle monitors offer these advantages, it is important to acknowledge that they are not a suitable punishment for everyone. They should be used with discretion, considering factors such as the offender's risk of reoffending and the nature of the crime. Ankle monitors are typically reserved for low-risk individuals who are not considered a danger to the community.

Frequently asked questions