Camera Tickets: Admissible Court Evidence?

Traffic camera tickets are issued when cameras placed in key traffic areas capture a driver breaking traffic rules. These tickets are typically sent to the owner of the car, and not the driver, and include a fine amount and an explanation of the citation. While some people argue that these tickets are unenforceable, they are generally valid and non-payment can lead to increased fines or even a warrant. However, there are several ways to dispute a traffic camera ticket, such as challenging the accuracy of the camera or arguing that the signage was missing or obscured. It's important to understand the process and your rights to effectively handle a traffic camera ticket.

Camera tickets are filed with the Seattle Municipal Court and processed like parking tickets

Camera tickets are issued by the Seattle Police Department for violations of local Seattle ordinance or Washington State law that are not legally defined as a crime. These civil violations include red light and school zone infractions. Once issued, these tickets are filed with the Seattle Municipal Court and processed like parking tickets.

Camera tickets will not appear on your state driving record. However, unpaid tickets may cause the Washington State Department of Licensing (DOL) to place a hold on your vehicle registration. This means that the DOL will not allow you to renew your registration until the tickets are paid.

If you receive a camera ticket, you have several options for responding. These include paying the ticket, requesting a reduction in the ticket amount, or contesting the ticket. You must respond on or before the date shown on the ticket.

If you want to pay the ticket, you can do so online, by mail, or in person at the Seattle Municipal Court. If you are unable to pay the full amount, you may be eligible for a 50% reduction if you meet certain criteria, such as being a first-time offender and receiving financial assistance from the state of Washington.

If you choose to contest the ticket, you can file a Declaration of Non-Responsibility, which is a sworn statement that you were not driving the vehicle at the time of the violation. You can also request a hearing to dispute the ticket. At the hearing, you can present evidence and argue that the prosecution cannot prove you were driving the vehicle or that the camera equipment was not properly maintained or calibrated.

Tickets are sent to the owner of the car, not the driver

Camera tickets are sent to the owner of the car, not the driver. This means that if you were not the one driving the car when the ticket was issued, you may not be prosecuted. However, this varies depending on the jurisdiction. For example, in New York, red-light camera tickets are treated like parking violations, and the registered owner of the vehicle is held liable. On the other hand, in Seattle, camera tickets are processed like parking tickets and will not appear on your state driving record.

If you receive a camera ticket, you can examine the details of the ticket, including the date, time, and location, to confirm that you were driving the car when the violation occurred. You can also review any photos included with the ticket to ensure that your car is clearly visible and identifiable. If the photos are blurry or unclear, this may be a valid defense against the ticket.

It's important to understand the specific laws and regulations in your jurisdiction regarding camera tickets. In some cases, you may need to plead not guilty and request a formal hearing to dispute the ticket. Additionally, you may have the right to confront witnesses and challenge the admissibility of the photographs as hearsay evidence.

Tickets can be disputed if the camera was not properly maintained or calibrated

Disputing Traffic Camera Tickets

Camera Maintenance and Calibration

If you want to dispute a traffic camera ticket, you can request full maintenance records for the camera and the traffic light or speed monitoring system. If the accuracy of the camera wasn't tested within a reasonable timeframe before your ticket was issued, the photo may be deemed unreliable as evidence.

You can also dispute the authenticity of the photograph if no one from the company that maintains the camera shows up to testify. In this case, you can object to the use of the photographs due to a lack of foundation. The prosecution must prove that the camera, the system connecting it to the traffic light, and the traffic light itself were functioning properly. Without establishing this foundation, the photo may not be admitted into evidence.

In addition to checking the maintenance and calibration of the camera, you can also employ other strategies to dispute a traffic camera ticket, as outlined below.

Other Strategies for Disputing Traffic Camera Tickets

• Check the date, time, and location of the ticket. Since camera tickets are sent to the owner of the car, make sure you were actually driving the car when the ticket was issued.
• Review the photos. If the license plate isn't clearly visible, it may be challenging to confirm that the car is yours. Additionally, if there is no clearly identifiable photo of you in the driver's seat, you can argue that the prosecution cannot prove you were driving, especially if you live in a jurisdiction that requires tickets to follow the driver rather than the registered owner of the car.
• Plead not guilty and request a formal hearing.
• Research applicable laws and cases in your city or county regarding traffic cameras. Look for recognized defenses, such as specific rules about where warning signs must be posted for traffic lights.
• Challenge the admissibility of the photograph as hearsay, depending on the jurisdiction.
• Assert your right to confront witnesses. Unless a witness appears who maintains the record and system associated with the camera, you do not have the opportunity to cross-examine them.
• Raise any other possible defenses, such as a necessity defense for speeding (e.g., driving to the hospital in an emergency).

Tickets may be invalid if signage was missing, obscured, or incorrectly placed

When it comes to camera tickets, signage plays a crucial role in their validity. If the signage indicating the rules that the camera is enforcing is missing, obscured, or incorrectly placed, it may provide a strong defence for invalidating the ticket. Here are some important points to consider:

• Missing or Obscured Signage: If the signage indicating the rules of the road, such as speed limits or red light restrictions, is missing or obscured, it can be challenging for the prosecution to prove that you were aware of the applicable rules. This is especially true if the signage was not visible at the time of the alleged violation. In such cases, you may be able to argue that you were not properly notified of the rules, and therefore, the ticket should be invalidated.
• Incorrect Placement of Signage: The placement of signage is also crucial. In some jurisdictions, there are specific requirements for where warning signs must be posted in relation to the camera-enforced areas. For example, signs may be required a certain distance before an intersection or camera zone. If the signs are placed incorrectly, this can be grounds for disputing the ticket.
• Visibility and Readability of Signage: Even if the signage is technically present, consider whether it was visible and readable to drivers. Factors such as lighting conditions, angle of approach, and obstructions can affect the visibility of signs. If the signage was not clearly visible or readable from the road, it may support your case for invalidating the ticket.
• Documentation and Evidence: It is important to gather evidence to support your claim. Take photographs of the signage, its placement, and its visibility from different angles. Note any obstructions or conditions that may have impacted its visibility. Also, review any photos or videos provided with the ticket to identify any discrepancies or issues.
• Jurisdictional Differences: It is essential to research the specific laws and regulations in your jurisdiction regarding signage requirements for camera-enforced rules. Some states or localities may have specific provisions dictating the placement, visibility, and content of signage related to camera-enforced rules. Understanding the applicable laws will help you build a stronger case.

In summary, the validity of a camera ticket relies heavily on proper signage notifying drivers of the rules. If you receive a ticket and believe that the signage was missing, obscured, or incorrectly placed, you may have grounds for disputing the ticket. Remember to review the specific laws in your area and consult with a legal professional if needed to build a strong defence.

Accumulating multiple tickets can indicate risky driving behaviour and lead to higher insurance premiums

Accumulating multiple traffic tickets can have significant implications for your driving record and insurance premiums. While a single minor speeding offence may not drastically increase your insurance costs, multiple infractions suggest a pattern of risky driving behaviour. Insurance companies use a range of factors to assess the risk level of insuring a driver, and speeding tickets are a key indicator. A history of speeding or multiple traffic violations can lead insurance providers to conclude that you are more likely to be involved in accidents or commit future traffic violations, which, in turn, increases your insurance premiums.

The impact of multiple tickets on your insurance rates can vary based on the severity of the offences and how frequently they occur. Minor speeding violations might result in a slight increase in premiums, while more severe offences, such as reckless driving or speeding in a school zone, can lead to significant rate hikes. Additionally, multiple offences within a short period can compound this effect, resulting in even higher premiums or even non-renewal of your policy.

In some cases, accumulating multiple speeding tickets or committing major traffic violations can lead to being classified as a high-risk driver. This classification can have a prolonged and severe impact on your insurance rates, as insurers see repeated offences as an indication of an increased likelihood of filing claims in the future. As a result, they adjust their rates to mitigate this risk, leading to significantly higher insurance premiums for high-risk drivers.

The consequences of multiple traffic tickets extend beyond financial penalties. These tickets can hurt your driving record and impact your wallet, with insurance companies treating violations differently. While one insurer may not raise your rate due to several non-moving violations, another may consider it a sign of risky behaviour and adjust your car insurance costs accordingly. Therefore, it is essential to understand how these tickets can affect your insurance rates and take steps to maintain a clean driving record to keep your insurance rates affordable.

Frequently asked questions